Water-quality intelligence

Groundwater in Thailand.

Groundwater pages should separate well identity, slow-changing lab context, present treatment needs, and location confidence so a mapped well is not mistaken for safe potable water.

Current page call

Explain how DGR well data and groundwater-quality context should be interpreted for drinking, drought, and rural-water pages.

3 source layers 2026-05-09 updated Scope matters

Decision fields

A strong water page says what the source can prove, what it cannot prove, and which water type or standard is actually being discussed before someone trusts a tap, river, beach, or groundwater claim.

FieldAnswer
Page typegroundwater guide
Primary useExplain how DGR well data and groundwater-quality context should be interpreted for drinking, drought, and rural-water pages.
Updated2026-05-09
Core caveatwells are not automatic drinking approval
Best for
  • well lookup
  • groundwater context
  • rural water planning
Watch
  • wells are not automatic drinking approval
  • groundwater quality data is slower
Useful sources
  • Department of Groundwater Resources wells
  • Department of Health drinking water standards
  • Thaiwater WaterQuality API

Canonical record checklist

Waterbody type, station ID, station coordinates, parameter values and units, observation time, WQI or MWQI scope where relevant, threshold source, water-use class, alert status, method, quality flag, source URL, confidence, and last verified date. Swim, tap, raw-water, wastewater, and groundwater interpretations should stay in separate fields.

Station Threshold Use